Yet another take on the Cracker Barrel rebrand.
TL’DR: The loud voices were the incorrect opinions to embrace.
This entire situation had nothing to do with design and everything to do with messaging (which Cracker Barrel did acknowledge, to be fair). That misstep then challenged the conviction, or lack thereof, of the entire business strategy that led to this new identity in the first place: attracting a broader and younger customer base.
Even in the year 2025, organizations still set out to reinvent themselves and rely too heavily on the design hitting the streets to galvanize the business shift. To me, Cracker Barrel’s intent was spot on. The strategy makes sense, but unfortunately the visual identity was left holding the mic alone on stage.
In reality, it’s the story and vision that need to set the stage for everything to come. Especially for a “beloved” company like this. It would even make sense to start seeding the new narrative before any visuals appear. At the end of the day, the restaurant’s customers don’t love barrel logos; what they love are the memories and experiences that the barrel logo signifies.
Even then, it’s still hard to please everyone. Thankfully, pleasing everyone is not the goal. The goal is rooted in the underlying business strategy that set the branding effort in motion in the first place. The Cracker Barrel CEO's vision, according to the Wall Street Journal: “leading a three-year transformation to modernize its decor and menu to attract a broader customer base, particularly younger and higher-income diners.”
Which now brings me to my point. If the strategy behind all of this effort was to move towards a new customer base, why let the loud voices of your current customers move you backwards? Better yet, why listen to a loud, noisy internet and non-customers? That includes President Trump chiming in: “Cracker Barrel should go back to the old logo, admit a mistake based on customer response, and manage the company better than ever before.” 😏
Come on. Trump isn’t eating at Cracker Barrel, no matter what logo sits atop the “Old Country Store.” Nor are most people who've fueled the unsolicited referendum with hollow internet opinions. That’s why I’m disappointed Cracker Barrel retreated. I understand that an internet frenzy is hard to endure, but others have crossed that chasm successfully. Airbnb got bashed significantly worse — but they understood the long game and ignored the random opinions of the internet.
Sure, I do think the new system lacked a little personality, but that’s OK. It would have worked just fine. Everyone would have moved past it, and Cracker Barrel could have built upon the new identity, driving further towards their goal. It’s the new in-store experiences, updated menu, and brand they build starting now that will dictate IF the logo is successful, not the other way around.
But alas, the internet has spoken. It loves the old logo, but not enough to actually show up and sit in a rocking chair and eat chicken-fried steak.
Logos don’t fill dining rooms — experiences do.
