This week, I learned a new term: Jevons paradox.
The Jevons paradox, aka the Jevons effect, occurs when technological improvements that increase the efficiency of a resource's use lead to a rise, rather than a fall, in total consumption of that resource.
A LinkedIn comment served this up in response to a “what if?” question I posed.
I love a good “what if?”. It forces you to silence your biases and fixed opinions, and simply wonder for a moment.
We’re surrounded by too many absolutes these days. This is bad. This is good. I don’t get down like that (or at least I try not to). In reality, our world is not that polar, yet we jump to final conclusions based on our mood, personal experiences, and the influence around us. Asking “What if …” allows us to dream more freely.
For instance, I asked LinkedIn, “What if … AI expands the appreciation and need for good strategy/writing/design? Not being the villain trying to kill it.”
Everyone is so resolved that AI is bad for companies like mine that I cannot help but wonder: what if it’s good? Not good in terms of “creating outputs faster.” I mean good in the Jevons paradox example: in total consumption of a resource.
If everyone is now actively trying to use AI to build their brand strategy, brand messaging, and brand visuals, will that rise in “consumption” put an even greater attention on the value of those outputs, the appreciation for the complexity, and the gaps of what AI can and cannot create?
Will AI put a spotlight on just how much brand matters now and in the future?
What if?